Just in case my file hasn’t been updated recently, and my place next to the stove in the re-education camp not reserved, this post should take care of that. You have been warned.
Should you be in need of something to raise your blood pressure and disturb you equanimity, read this? Go ahead, more will be below.
We, the taxpayers, fund this.
Note the righteous certainty, of the people quoted, of their beliefs.
Anyone who might disagree is dismissed, their beliefs of no importance, and their very existence a hindrance, nay, threat to the world these people want. The very idea those in disagreement might, just might, have real and legitimate grievances doesn’t seem to enter their thoughts. Such utter arrogance!
An undertone in the article and remarks by those quoted is fear, fear of the right and the desire to neutralize the right. I don’t know what they fear. Most people on the right are law abiding hard working people trying to raise families. They won’t do squat except squawk. 300,000,000 firearms just sitting threaten nobody.
What is needed by the right is George Soros level funding to create and sustain a core of professional organizers backed by on call lawyers. The professionals can then direct operations that sting and terrorize the left. Examples would include sabotage of infrastructures that benefit principally the deep state and associated parasites. Say the Washington D.C. beltway suburban communities. Silicon Valley. Martha’s Vineyard. Aspen. No electricity, no water? That will get their attention quickly.
Violence? Sniping the election officials and elected Secretary of State office holders around the country who took an oath to provide fair elections and violated their oaths. Wounding, not killing, as their actions don’t warrant the death penalty. They are soft targets. Look at what was accomplished in 2002 by two perps in what was called the D.C. Sniper attacks. Moreover, they picked random targets.
So, WSF, will you lead the charge? The answer is no, I’m of the “won’t do squat except squawk” coalition. My excuse? Age and finances. That hasn’t always been the case. My late ex-wife and I had a 5” thick FBI file (pre digital age) per her supervisor when she was hired to be a reader/aide for a blind woman in the Department of Education around 1990.
Her crime? Was the catalyst for a Congressman raising hell over the conditions and neglect of miscreant airmen in “retraining barracks” at Lowry AFB circa 1965.
Mine? One of three veterans that started a college veteran’s organization taking the Veterans Administration to task over late payments and lost paperwork. We founders dropped out after leaving college but the ad hoc organization once had 3,000 members statewide in Colorado.
In later years the ex and I became founders and officers in the Seattle chapter of the National Autism Association. The Education for All law in Washington State was drafted by three women on our dining room table and my ex worked three years to get it passed.
We were minor, very minor, participants in the political scene.
All these activities put us on different shit lists, something we took pride in.
The above is meant to establish some creditable basis for my rants.
Back to my suggestions, the globalist funded leftist violence of recent years is, IMO, the reason for implementing them. As always, YMMV.
9 comments:
I utterly LOATHE the idea that NPR and PBS are taxpayer funded. I've always thought that if their content is sooooo great/important/earth-shaking then it should be able to stand on its own merits and get funding somewhere else.
But of course none of them have asked my opinion.
In my internet wanderings/readings I've seen more than one call to action, including the idea of killing the election workers who were just doing their job of counting, no different than counting cans of beans at the grocery store or widgets in a warehouse.
I don't understand the idea of killing someone because the election outcome wasn't what you wanted.
And I wonder if you can find out if the FBI is still investigating you?
One would think 'no' but more ridiculous things have happened, now haven't they?
Ami
Note I don't advocate killing anyone and am very specific about who should be sniped.
Is the FBI and/or other agencies stil tracking me. Probably all done automatically by computers now. I joke about camps but believe in my case the Clinton solution will be used.
You might look into the situation in the City of Roses in terms of business insurance at any downtown location.
I wasn't suggesting that you advocated anything.
Sorry if it looked that way.
I've just done a great deal of reading and have found the idea more than once and in some places I hadn't expected to see it. And I seriously don't understand it.
They are out of their friggin minds... Once things start, there won't be any pulling back... sigh
OldNFO
Unintended consequences.
Note their fear, implicit in the article.
And I like this:
"What is needed by the right is George Soros level funding to create and sustain a core of professional organizers backed by on call lawyers. The professionals can then direct operations that sting and terrorize the left. Examples would include sabotage of infrastructures that benefit principally the deep state and associated parasites. Say the Washington D.C. beltway suburban communities. Silicon Valley. Martha’s Vineyard. Aspen. No electricity, no water? That will get their attention quickly."
Yes indeed.
LSP
Thank you!
And I forgot to say -- my mother's grandfather, who HATED Communists, got himself visited by the Feds in the 1930s. His crime? Running around Oklahoma saying Hitler was a threat... hmmmm.
LSP
Rationing during the world wars, the New Deal, internment of "aliens", etc. have, to me, eerie similarities to the current pandemic hoax. Folks who spoke out in the past often found themselves being leaned on by the establishment's storm troopers.
Perhaps men of the cloth who don't toe the line find themselves in obscure, out of the way, postings. Nah, that never happens, does it?
Post a Comment