Showing posts with label ATF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ATF. Show all posts

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Anti-Government Rant

 Jackboot Thugs

Another story of the ATF doing a full scale raid on a couple’s home in the early hours and treating the man and wife like dangerous terrorists.  Why the heavy handed tactics when there was no need? 0800 go up and knock on the door. Second question, why wasn’t the county sheriff there? Two deputies in over their heads and likely not trained for that type of situation, would make me question why that sheriff needs to be reelected, if I were a voter in that county.

Hopefully the Trump administration will get this rouge agency under control.

MORE

 It has happened before.

MORE

And not just ATF

MORE

But wait, there is more.

Slickers

Finally

Recent

Butter

Once again I’m seeing articles on how butter is bad and various “spreads” are healthier. Maybe, but something that is one molecule away from plastic isn’t something I want to ingest.

 Not all butter in the supermarket is the same. I try to find “first churned”, usually Amish, roll butter. Expensive, but my health is worth it.

Pardons

I’m not a lawyer and haven’t stayed at a Holiday Inn Express in years. That said, I think SloJo’s handlers have made a huge blunder. Those “pardoned” can no long take the 5th, as I understand the way the system works. Slimy Milley didn’t just do it alone. He had aides, subordinates, who in the normal course of time will be promoted into higher position. They helped him, and they can be prosecuted. The head snake may escape but the pit of vipers can’t.

 There are scores of  MIlleys sitting on a Presidential pardon.

 Are these subordinates going to quietly accept their fate? Or, will they take out the threat to them? Will our national murder rate have an upswing?

 “If no one talks, we all walk”.

EV Blues

Trump pledges to target the EV industry, while Coloradans widely embrace their clean new cars

Typical leftist journalism click bait headline. Because of big subsidies (i.e. sucking at the taxpayer’s tit) some people buy electric vehicles. The rest of us paying for those subsidies are less enthusiastic.

MORE

My view? Go President, Trump, go!

Speaking of American Mainstream Maggots (h/t BZ)

Anonymous source, not authorized to speak publicly, says………….

Which likely means the anonymous source is the reporter’s imagination.

 He wants to be your next President

Such a good smoke and mirrors job he has done to Colorado, just imagine what he can do for the country!

 MORE

Choice Pallet

I’m falling behind on the competition for the best pallet next to the stove with no fuel. LL, among others, is way ahead.

 As always, YMMV

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Stakeholders BATFE (ATF)



A term often seen in the media is “stakeholder”, which seems to be the highly educated folks way of saying someone has a dog in the fight. Guess it sounds snappier than the more accurate “vested interest”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vested_interest

Since 2006, the Director of ATF has required Senate confirmation, and no one has been confirmed, leaving the Bureau headed by an “Acting Director”. The Bureau has become a political football. Yes, this is Captain Obvious stuff for the four or five regular readers of my scribbles. This is being written on the offhand chance some “gun violence” troll might stumble across this, and be looking for possible solutions. Hey, it could happen.

Want proof? This is from ATF’s own website.

Q: How can a person apply for relief from Federal firearms disabilities?
Under the provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), convicted felons and certain other persons are prohibited from possessing or receiving firearms. TheGCA provides the Attorney General with the authority to grant relief from this disability where the Attorney General determines that the person is not likely to act in a manner dangerous to the public safety and granting relief would not be contrary to the public interest. The Attorney General delegated this authority to ATF.
Since October 1992, however, ATF’s annual appropriation has prohibited the expending of any funds to investigate or act upon applications for relief from Federal firearms disabilities submitted by individuals. As long as this provision is included in current ATF appropriations, the Bureau cannot act upon applications for relief from Federal firearms disabilities submitted by individuals.
[18 U.S.C. 922(g), 922(n) and 925(c)]

Please note.

appropriation has prohibited the expending of any funds to investigate or act upon applications for relief

Now who is responsible for this “gotcha”? How about Senator Chuck Schumer, D NY who boasts about it; that he has  defunded this  going back to his days as a Congressman. Seems everything his finders touch has “gotchas”.

Want another example of “gun violence” trolls trying to use the public purse to advance their goals? Try this.
You do need to read between the lines.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22458.pdf

For folks who “hate” guns, and by extension firearms users and owners, the truth that seldom comes out is this: Firearms owners are against “gun violence”. Their feelings are stronger than yours because their feelings are based on facts, they know what the hell they are talking about. No one wants the elimination of criminal use of firearms more than firearm owners.

Firearms owners who pay attention to national news know, without question, a powerful bloc of political, media, and academia segments want to totally disarm the citizenry. If they can’t repeal the 2nd Amendment, they will try to gut it. Firearm owners oppose them tooth and nail. As the fur flies, those who benefit from this conflict are the criminals. Little attention is paid to finding and bringing to court those who use firearms for criminal purposes.

So here is a modest proposal. Obama and his fellow travelers need to recognize the firearms community as stakeholders. There must be a few individuals, with the necessary skills to manage ATF, who are acceptable to the NRA, GOA, etc. This would make the ATF non partisan. Aren’t our institutions supposed to be exactly that?

I've tried to keep a civil tongue in writing this. Yes, you can "Yeah, but" everything I say. Try this idea; we are all in the life boat together, and need to learn to row together.