As explained by an editorial in the Colorado Springs rag.
Its landmark taxing and spending limits on
government in our state have been in effect for so long, many Coloradans might
have forgotten what it once was like to live at the whim of tax-hiking
politicians. That ended when voters added TABOR — its better-known acronym — to
the state’s constitution in 1992.
Nearly three decades later, it is easy to
take it for granted. A lot of newer Coloradans probably never even have heard
of it — and don’t realize how much they continue to benefit from it.
Yet, it has remained a tempting target for
those who were forced to cede their power to it. Its decades long effectiveness
in keeping state and local government on a diet has invited a succession of
court challenges.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th
Circuit in Denver ruled Monday that the plaintiffs — this time, a number
of local governments — had failed to show how TABOR violated the act of
Congress that had granted Colorado statehood and assured it a republican form
of government. Monday’s decision brought a decade-old lawsuit to a close.
It was a complicated case invoking a novel
argument — that requiring a popular vote on tax hikes somehow flouts republican
democracy — and the plaintiffs arguably merit a pat on the back if only for
their creativity. Taxpayers might prefer to give the plaintiffs a swift kick,
instead, for their underlying presumption that they know best how to spend our
tax dollars.
To recap, then, for those who don’t recall or
never knew: TABOR, aka Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution,
requires a vote of the people on any tax increase and bonded debt. Even more
consequential to our state’s relative fiscal health: TABOR limits annual
increases in tax revenue to population growth plus inflation. Any additional
revenue taken in over that combined percentage must be returned to taxpayers
unless they say otherwise at the polls. And those guardrails apply to
government at all levels in Colorado, from the state on down to each county,
city and school district.
TABOR has kept budgets in line and government
growth in check. Its safeguard against runaway tax hikes also has contributed
fundamentally to the prosperity of Colorado’s economy — the creator of jobs,
investment opportunities and other bounty that benefit us all.
Of course, TABOR hasn’t survived unscathed.
It has lost some of its teeth in some legal dustups before unsympathetic judges
over the years.
That’s why it’s all the more refreshing when
a federal appellate court sides with the taxpayer as happened this week. After
all these years, TABOR continues to serve the taxpayer — long after so many
elected officials seem to forget who sent them to office in the first place.
— The Gazette editorial board,
Dec. 16
TABOR was a concept born in the late 1980’s and pushed in many states. Colorado is the only state where it was adopted.
As with any legislation, it is not perfect and has harmed a few while benefiting many.
The (P)regressives hate it. Thwarts all their utopian plans. They are always trying to find ways to nullify it. Their latest scam is “fees” instead of taxes. That is now being challenged in the courts.
Pass the popcorn, please.
4 comments:
Yep, plenty of popcorn needed!
Regardless of what happens in 2024, President Trump's enduring legacy is the 500 judges he got appointed to the Federal Courts.
Great news. Let's see more TABOR.
LSP
Other states need to pass their versions. In most cases it is a constitutional amendment, as in CO.
Post a Comment