Doing a mental “connect the dots”
prompted by reading several bloggers starting with Old NFO https://oldnfo.org and
a comment by LL http://symbolic-mirage.blogspot.com
taken in it’s
entirety.
The corrupt, venal, smug, nasty, lying,
elite mainstream media is only a vehicle through which funds flow. They’re a
tool for other, hidden interests which supported Hillary, which delivered
protesters to the rallies that President Trump held, paid the protesters, gave
then a sack lunch.
You can’t expect the mainstream media to
ask HONEST questions. They’re part of the system of the beast, wholly owned and
operated.
The setback caused by the Clinton
defeat, no matter how many billions she spent on ads, was incremental and a
setback, but it didn’t slow the agenda.
Free people are armed, slaves are not.
They need to disarm America and that’s been a relentless agenda.
Some of the dots are:
Firearms control (I hate to use 'gun' unless talking about a smooth-bore -blame the NCO’s at Ft. Leonard Wood Basic
Training)
Transnational gangs and the abysmal
failure to combat them.
Drug and opioid abuse.
Bizarre behaviors tied to prescription
drug use. Example. Teachers having sex with their students. Young men shooting
up schools.
Conspiracy theories as camouflage by
government entities, particularly the intelligence communities, after events or
exposure of illegal practices. There is
an immediate explosion of conspiracy theories. Coincidence or planned
responses?
Constant pointless wars sapping the
nation’s wealth.
Relentless attacks on our way of life by
wealthy individuals with no consequences to them. Some are very public, such as
George Soros.
Is all of this an accident, or part of a
plan? Do the dots connect? There is an
agenda, as pointed out by LL, but who’s agenda? Or, competing agendas?
Or, is WSF guilty of fomenting another
unsubstantiated conspiracy theory? YMMV
8 comments:
When I was younger we had a relative who'd married into the family. He tried very hard to get everyone to buy in and get off the grid. Didn't work, perhaps I'd be there now?
We all thought he was crazy. Now I think he may have been the only sane one in the bunch.
Self reliance is an "anti social" attitude. More power to him.
I am not a conspiracy theorist. However, there is clearly a move by people (the same people who succeeded with Barack but not with Hillary) to destroy the integrity of the US. One key element of doing this is the elimination of privately owned firearms. Imagine trying to do something truly radical when your efforts are faced by 300 million firearms and trillions of rounds of ammo in civilian hands. It's the largest armed (potential) militia in the world. At presently those numbers lack cohesion, a purpose and a leader to effect change, but that can happen.
Persuading people that transsexuality and gender fluidity is the way forward is easy compared to getting people (mainly in the South, Mid-West and West) to hand over their defensive measures to an uncaring and often corrupt government.
At presently those numbers lack cohesion, a purpose and a leader to effect change, but that can happen.
Exactly why it hasn't happened.
I've wondered a lot of the same things, WSF.
Throw in Planned Parenthood and the forced acceptance/admission of distinctly alien cultures, and I'm right with you...
Agree with LL. And I don't see us going willingly, at least not in my lifetime!
I'm sure there are more additions - just skimmed the surface.
I know many in the younger generations that feel the same.
Post a Comment